Review code changes for quality, security, and correctness. Use when the user says "review this PR", "review these changes", "check my code", "look at what I changed", or after implementing a feature. Produces a severity-organized report.
Address PR review comments systematically. Use when responding to code review feedback on a pull request.
- 📁 experiment-design/
- 📁 idea-generation/
- 📁 paper-reading/
- 📄 CLAUDE.md
- 📄 LICENSE
- 📄 README.md
Complete academic research skill suite covering the full pipeline: paper reading (read/explain papers with storytelling), idea generation (brainstorm research directions), experiment design (plan experiments, ablation, baselines), proof writing (mathematical proofs, LaTeX theorems), paper writing (draft to camera-ready for top venues like NeurIPS/ICLR/ACL), paper review (structured 4-step review with scoring), and professor fit analysis (evaluate advisors, cold emails, interview strategy). Trigger keywords: read paper, brainstorm, experiment design, prove, write paper, review, professor fit, advisor, cold email, LaTeX, research, NeurIPS, ICLR, ACL, arXiv, 讀論文, 寫論文, 審稿, 實驗設計, 數學證明, 研究方向, 教授分析, 選指導教授.
- 📄 checklist.md
- 📄 common-issues.md
- 📄 quick-review.sh
Use when the user asks to review code, check for issues, or says "review", "审查", "检查代码
Run a local code review against project architecture rules and quality standards. Use when the user asks to review code, check for violations, or audit changes.
This skill should be used when a user asks for a code review, feedback on a PR or MR, diff assessment, or says things like 'can you review my changes', 'look at this diff', 'is this ready to merge', 'check my code', 'review this branch', 'what do you think of these changes', or 'LGTM check'. Covers correctness, tests, performance, security, and architecture feedback on pull/merge requests or raw diffs from any platform (GitHub, GitLab).
- 📄 architecture-review.md
- 📄 deep-review.md
- 📄 SKILL.md
Reference documents for deep code review (Level 3) and architecture review (Level 4). Used by code-reviewer agent for advanced review levels.
Project initialization, idea tracking, and GitHub setup. Use when starting a new project, reviewing deferred ideas, or bootstrapping GitHub labels and project boards.
- 📁 references/
- 📄 README.md
- 📄 SKILL.md
Audit designs against 18 professional rules across Figma files and code (HTML/CSS/React/Vue/Tailwind). Detects framework automatically, runs category-specific code superpowers (aria, focus, contrast, tokens, responsive, motion, forms, navigation, spacing), audits for dark patterns and ethical design issues, outputs before/after code diffs, and generates a structured developer handoff report. Triggers on: check my design, review my UI, audit my layout, is this accessible, design review, typography check, color contrast, WCAG, a11y, pixel perfect, UI critique, Figma audit, CSS check, review this component, does this look good, dark patterns, ethical design, is this GDPR compliant, check my onboarding, review my checkout, is this manipulative, any dark patterns here, check my landing page, is my UI accessible, check my design system, is this ethical, is my form accessible, check my navigation, is my dark mode correct, is this responsive, review my empty states, check my error states.
Review Markdown documents using the MRSF (Sidemark) sidecar format. Use when asked to review, comment on, or provide feedback on Markdown files. Adds structured, anchored review comments via the MRSF MCP server.
Pre-commit code quality review for Unity C# code. Checks against Rules, CODING_STANDARDS.md, NAMING_CONVENTIONS.md, and GDD Gherkin test coverage. Use when code has been written and tests are passing but before committing. Runs automatically at Step 8.5 of /uw-cmd-implement-feature. Triggers on "review this code", "check my implementation", "pre-commit review", "code review", "check before commit", "is this ready to commit", "review my changes", or any request to validate code quality before committing.
- 📁 .clawhub/
- 📁 references/
- 📄 _meta.json
- 📄 SKILL.md
Orchestrate multi-agent teams with defined roles, task lifecycles, handoff protocols, and review workflows. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 2+ agents with different specializations, (2) Defining task routing and lifecycle (inbox → spec → build → review → done), (3) Creating handoff protocols between agents, (4) Establishing review and quality gates, (5) Managing async communication and artifact sharing between agents.